Re: DAR Methodology Evaluated - 17 Statements - Civiil Discussion
Google Internet Article Title "DAR versus DNA"
comments powered by
Whit Athey PhD sums it up, when he concluded
"Rejecting evidence, regardless of how it might be used,
is just plain silly."
Key Word, "regardless of how it might be used."
confirmed paper-work in the case of Rev. War Soldier
Reuben Bates (1731-1800)
TRIANGULATION PROOF -CONFIRMATION OF PAPER WORK
Reuben Bates headed the only Bates family in Louisa Co.VA
during the period 1775-1800.
TRIANGULATION - PAPER TRIAL BACK TO REUBEN BATES
1. DNA donor, a Silver Star Medal Winner,traced his lineage back to James Bates of Lousa Co.,,documented son of Reuben Bates Rev. War Soldier.
2. DNA donor - traced his lineage back to Reuben Bates (Junior) of Louisa Co., documented son of Reuben Bates Sr.
Remember, Rev. War Solider Reuben Bates headed the only
Bates family in Louisa Co.VA during the War Period
DNA,two (repeat two) donors, who descend from documented sons of Reuben Bates - their DNA match exactly
Like Dr. Athey, for DAR to reject this type of DNA evidence
is plain silly.