Jon, Blue has been adding suggestions to his "wish list" for so long, I don't think we remember all the suggestions that have been made since the UFT 3.0 release (and some from before that didn't make it into 3.0). I think what we all would like first is a release that fixes some of the significant bugs that have been discussed with some heat on this board. Unfortunately, it seems that Blue is not allowed to talk about what the company is thinking or doing about any of these changes (if anything) until the powers that be decide to make a formal announcement. Blue, Paul, it would be nice if the company did some pro-active customer consultation to a) identify useful and feasible enhancements, and b) survey customers to see how important various enhancements are. Some of the active users may be interested in collecting, evaluating, and posting such a list, maybe in conjunction with a user group web site. Or is this liable to raise user expectations much higher that the company is willing to satisfy? My own wish list has two main items: first, fix the citation problem in the Family Journal. Then, if there is time, get rid of the redundancy in the reverse register FJ report: under grandad, I don't need all the events and text for his spouse, if I get the same information in the section under grandma, and vice versa.