New 'bug' in gedcom import
comments powered by
I do not know if the 'bug list' is followed as promised but I found another one to add to the list. It is not actually a bug but a misinterpretation of the gedcom.
I imported a gedcom file with following text:
1 NAME Sam/VANDENBRUWAENE/
1 SEX M
2 DATE 27 FEB 1995
2 PLAC Brugge
2 TYPE living
Instead of making an individual with the living field said to 'Yes' UFT adds an event to the event template named #living.
To whom it concerns TMG imported the gedcom file the same way there was a 'tag' named 'living' and the flag 'living' had a '?' in it. I will report the same 'bug' to Bob Velke.