Re: Still tangled on Stirling Alexanders
Oops!Now I'm confused again!I was correcting my data from a print-out of your posting 3366, when I noticed you have this:
comments powered by
". . .Rev. James Alexander is a son of William, 1st Earl of Stirling. . ."
"[William, 1st Earl, and Janet Erskine's] children: . . .James b. 1610 his son James b. 1634 married Mary Maxwell. . ."
So does that mean that Rev. James (b. 1634 and married to Mary Maxwell) is the son of James b.1610 and the grandson of William?
Alas--on the other data bases I have looked at, they don't have any information for James b. 1610.