I show the same, but in addition he had four half brothers. I had assumed that one or more of the four brothers to whom she referred would have been half brothers. Another possibility is that there were a total of four brothers, so that she simply misstated, saying he AND his four brothers came, when she really meant that a total of four brothers came. I have not yet found letters or other documents that list the names of the brothers to whom she refers. I have not yet attempted to track all the brothers and half brothers through the censuses, which may answer that question.