Give details of WHAT you mean.Everything you have said is cryptic.
What records are you referring to?The text for reference.If I wrote something in 1958, the findings of forty years could well have turned it around 180 degrees, and probably have.
So far EVERYTHING you have posted about this George, Nathan Rochell thing has been unintelligible gibberish.When refuting, or trying to refute, give details, - "you said this on this past occasion'.- "Now you say this, - and it's inconsistent." -We can't read your mind when you say something like, "Mr. Fly knows better."What is it that you had from me in 1958 that you are quoting?I didn't know you in 1958.Spell it out, so your point can be understood, will you?