Hi, Larry: I meant to put this in my last post. There is this statement, by James Savage, in his discussion of Peter Lyon, and Savage is usually accurate: "Peter, Dorchester ... His sec. w. Hannah or Ann, was d. of Thomas Tolman, and d. 26 Nov. 1689." It is in Vol. 3, p. 137 of Savage, at:http://www.archive.org/stream/agenealogicaldi03dextgoog#page/n146/mode/1uphttp://www.archive.org/stream/agenealogicaldi03dextgoog#page/n146/mode/1up As it is under Lyon, that is probably why the Lyon researchers claim the relationship (Ann d. of Thomas).I just don't see anything else, though, to support the relationship, and Tolman researchers seem to definitely reject it.