In researching Michael Upchurch (1624-1681), I ran across a document that revises what we've believed all these years was the birthyear of Michael's son, Michael Jr.
This is a significant find. If Michael Jr. was old enough to have fathered the third generation, could he be our ancestor instead of Richard Upchurch?
After sharing this info with the editor of the Upchurch Bulletin, he asked for an article and documentation. Long story short... the complete article was published in the December 2010 UB. I've posted the complete article on my Web site: