Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisited”
comments powered by
Still another nonsensical answer. Understanding the origins and purposes of the DAR and the submissions of Phebe in this regard, are quite essential to the genealogical argument.
I have sought to make it plain that today's DAR is very much different from its origins. Thus , Phebe's application would surely be rejected by the organization we know today.
Back then, it was a different story.
You wax proud of your determined ignorance of history and and the history of genealogy, and now, the history of such organizations as the DAR.Such crowing undermines your position.
Your personal patriotism, as you define it, and your ailments, has nothing whatsoever to do with the topic.
If you want this to be about genealogy, I welcome you aboard.