There is a very long and detailed answer soon to be on it's way. I hope it doesn't exceed whatever the character limitations are for the forum. It might do so, in which case I will have to break it into a sequence of postings.
After it is sent you will get your heart felt wish. I will be gone but not for the reason you might think.
After having worked with real professional researchers in the years prior to corresponding with you and Doug I have finally grown weary of your somewhat immature, sarcastic and ridiculing postings.
Truly "cousin" you respond for the most part in a very immature manner and you make more faux pas than I have witnessed from Doug.I go into much detail about one you made in a posting a week or so back. I back up my critique of your errors with one affidavit which I include.
An excellent example of your type of sarcasm and ridicule is this post of yours to which I am now responding.
Yes I do have the rather nasty habit of responding in kind to the posts I receive. Treat me with sarcasm and I shall treat you with sarasm. Treat me with respect and I will treat you in like manner. Respond as a mature adult and I will do likewise.
As you sow so shall you reap - ever read or hear that one?
You do leave me somewhat baffled with you allegations of aliases. I currenly use legacy and have done so exceeding a year now. Your thinking is so convoluted that you can't even resist ridiculing a user name! Truly pathetic but so typical of immaturity in an adult. Prior to a year ago I used blackcloud - Doug had a lot of fun with that user name, I forget my next user name. My first user name was gusman and I quickly learned not to use my surname as a user name. Each user name resulted from a change to a different ISP. So what and where is your problem.
If I wanted to wow you with user name aliases you have my assurance that I could overwhelm you as could any other user of the Internet.
I include the initial paragraph in my forthcoming response to earlier posts which you made. I hope to get it out within a day or two more. You should find the complete post on the titillating side, perhaps even creating a bit of anger. Such is life..........
Ya all have a nice day now cousin.
Gusman - You don’t have a prayer of redirecting “my fixations” toward anything except the allegations which you and your buddy continue to heap on the affidavits and the deponents. For instance let us look at this one. Another excellent example of how you place words and thoughts never written by the deponents into the minds of those people dead 76-78 years and somewhat less for Violetta. The errors you appear to have made in Paragraph 3 immediately following have the appearance of being intentionally designed to influence readers against the validity of the affidavits. They are frankly too much on the unbelievable side to have been unintentional.I include a copy of Fanny’s affidavit to back up my critique of what appears to be intentional distortions by yourself designed to influence readers against the veracity of the affidavits. One affidavit is sufficient as Fanny and Ferdinand are nearly identical content.