|
Introduction to the 1900 Census
The turn of the century found the U.S. entering a period of great advancement...the
widespread introduction of such luxuries as electricity, airplanes, and movies
was soon to come. Who were your ancestors in 1900 and where were they living
as these changes unfolded? The pervasiveness of western migration at that time
can make tracing individuals in the early 20th century difficult.
This time period is also critical for many genealogists, particularly novices.
Here, families begin stretching beyond the personal frame of reference for most
patriarchs and matriarchs, who serve as primary sources for word-of-mouth family
histories. Not only will the 1900 U.S. Census empower you to break through such
research barriers with primary source records, it can also open doors to conduct
18th and 19th century research. For the first time, you can research
the entire census, containing approximately 75 million names, quickly
and easily from your home computer using a 25 million name head of household
index.
One of the reasons the 1900 census is such a valuable resource is that most
of the 1890 census was destroyed by a fire in the Commerce Department building
on January 21, 1921. While not all of the forms were destroyed (in fact, portions
do exist for Alabama, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota,
New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas), most were
so badly damaged that Congress authorized their disposal.
Additionally, the 1900 census provides unique information that was not included
in the 1880 census nor in the 1910 census. For this reason, the 1900 census
is uniquely able to fill in blanks in your family history.
The 1900 census was the first to employ the practice of noting how long an
immigrant has been in the United States and whether that person was naturalized.
It was also the first to list the following:
- Whether a farm or home was owned or rented (if owned, whether the property
was mortgaged)
- How many years a person had been married
- Whether an individual spoke English
- How many children a mother had and how many of those children were still
living
- If a person was a Civil War veteran or widow
This data set is unique because it includes not only a head of household
index to the 1900 U.S. Census, but also images of the actual census itself.
From the alphabetical name Index you can gather an ancestor's first and last
name, county and location where they lived at the time of the census, and the
microfilm page number on which their information appears. On a 1900 census image,
you can find interesting details about an ancestor's life and clues for additional
research. For information on how to use census records in your family history
research, please see the chapter of this introduction called "Understanding
Census Information."
We believe that overall, Genealogy.com's 1900 U.S. Census contains the highest-quality
set of these images available. We scanned previously unused microfilm so that
images show virtually no scratching. Images have been straightened, cropped,
and cleaned. We have provided images in relatively small file sizes for faster
download and lower disk usage. While Genealogy.com has taken great care to produce
high-quality scans of these records, we recognize that the quality of the images
scanned for this data set varies. In rare cases, portions of images are
illegible.
When using this data, it is important to remember that these are
100 year-old documents. By the time the originals were photographed onto microfilm
approximately 40 years after the census, the ink had faded and some of the pages
were damaged by water, tape, ink splats, holes, bad folds, or tears. Additionally,
the photographic quality often suffered due to exposure, lighting, and obstruction
issues. In both of these scenarios, going back to even the original microfilm
will not help to retrieve lost information.
In another scenario, due to the scanning process used to transfer the microfilm
records and despite our best efforts, the center of an image may appear broken
up or the edges may be blackened. In this rare case, referring to the original
microfilm records will provide the needed information. These records are easy
to locate, as the National Archives microfilm series, roll, and page numbers
are recorded in both an individual's Index record and on screen above the actual
census schedule image.
As you navigate the 1900 census, you will recognize two sources for obtaining
information on individuals in this data. Information is available
using the index to this subscription or by viewing the image of the actual
census page.
Index to This Data Set
You will find basic information about an individual in the 1900 Census index.
You can reach the index by either the "Search" or "Browse"
methods described below. In an index record, you will find the following information:
- Name The individual's given name, middle name or initial (when available),
and surname.
- Lived in The specific locale where the individual resided at the
time of the census. This field can contain the name of a city, town, ward,
or district, plus county and state.
- Series/Microfilm/Book/Page The location in the original microfilm
where you will find this individual's record.
The Census Schedule Images
This data set is unique because it contains images of the actual 1900
U.S. Census. In general, each successive decennial census has gathered successively
more detailed information. These census schedules are the most information-rich
currently available. On a 1900 census image, you can find the following information
about an individual:
- Name
- State, County, Township
- Street and house number (where appropriate)
- Relationship to head-of-household
- Color or race
- Sex
- Month and year of birth and age at last birthday
- Marital status and number of years married
- For married women, number of children born and number living
- Birthplace (state, territory, or country)
- Father's and Mother's birthplace
- Year of immigration and number of years in the United States
- Citizenship status for aliens or naturalized citizens over age 21
- Occupation (for each person 10+) and number of months not employed
- Information about school attendance
- Ability to read, write, and speak English
- Home ownership status, mortgage status, or farm residence
You will find three methods of navigating the 1900 US Census:
- Search
- Browse
- Go to County
1. Search
Because Genealogy.com has now indexed the 1900 U.S. Census by head of household,
you can search for ancestors on any 1900 census project either before or after
purchase. The FamilyFinder Index is available on most Genealogy.com pages, including
your personal online data library and every census image and index page. When
searching, results will provide a ranked list, organized by data collection.
If you subscribe to the data collection listed, you can immediately
access either this data introduction or the actual census image. If you do not
own the project listed, you will find links to the purchase page for the corresponding
data collection.
You may have difficulty locating some names for the following reasons:
- Some given names have been abbreviated. For example, "Robert" may appear
as "Robt," and "Elizabeth" as "Eliz."
- Some given names are misspelled, contain typos, or may be spelled unusually.
- Some given and middle names are truncated. Specifically, this happens when
the name, including the spaces between the given name, middle name, and last
name, is longer than twenty-three characters. For example, "Robertson, Annabelle
Margaret" would be listed as "Robertson, Annabelle Mar."
The index to this data set may contain typographical and transposition errors
(for example, Neslon instead of Nelson). Many of these have been corrected,
but if you do not find your ancestor, check under likely misspellings. Transcription
errors also might appear in this index (for example, Counnon
instead of Cammon; Charles Weineger instead of Charles Weisenger). Again, checking
likely misspellings may turn up an entry for your ancestor.
If you are unable to locate a particular given name and surname, try switching
the given name to an initial, abbreviation, or possible misspelling. If the
surname is not common, you may also only want to search only on the surname.
2. Browse
After purchasing a 1900 census project, click the corresponding link for that
title in your online data library. Enter the first three letters of the
last name you are looking for. Click on "Go" and you will be brought
to the page where that name initially appears. From that point, you can browse
backward and forward in the index, using the "Previous Page" and "Next Page"
links. When you find an ancestor's name, select the "See Page Image" link to
view the actual census image page referencing that name. With the convenience
of having the original census at your fingertips, it is possible to look for
people omitted from the index. Browse the index for relatives or neighbors who
lived in the same area and look to the adjoining pages for your ancestors.
3. Go to County
You may also navigate this data using the "Go to County" feature. Centered at the bottom of the image page, you'll find a "Go to County" drop-down menu and
a "Page" box. Using this feature, you can search for ancestors by location.
If you already know an ancestor's county of residence and the original census
microfilm page, you may enter that information, and select "Go" to locate that
record. If you know only county of residence, select that county then and select "Go" to browse the images from the first record for that county. Please note, on a project containing multiple
states, the drop-down menu will only reflect counties in the state corresponding
to the current image. To find a county in another state, go to the "Browse"
screen and choose an individual from the state you want. Go to the corresponding
image page and from there you can access counties in that state from the drop-down
menu. This is another way of locating an ancestor not included in the index.
If you already know where your ancestor lived, you can page through the census
and browse the records for that area. Or, you could find information about your
ancestor's neighbors or relatives who lived in the same area and browse the
adjoining pages for your ancestor.
The information in this section describes the problems with census data
that can make it difficult to locate your ancestors. Knowing about these problems
can help you with your research.
Over the decades, census enumerators inadvertently created complicated and
confusing problems in the census records. Most of these problems are simply
due to unintended mistakes. In addition, many original records have unfortunately
been subject to decades of unprofessional archival storage and general public
misuse.
As you use this data collection, please remember the following: The final burden
of proof in determining the correctness or incorrectness of a name in a census
index or record lies with you, the researcher. In addition, the best research
arises from individuals pursuing independent verification and relying on multiple
research sources.
Below, we'll examine the various mistakes found in census materials. At best
we can only give you a basic outline of what pitfalls you may expect. If you
have trouble finding a name in the index, take some of these pitfalls into account.
You may end up finding the name in a place that you did not expect it to be.
The Census Enumerators
Each enumerator and census marshall had a different level of education.
Therefore, spelling names in various languages may have been difficult for them,
so they may have made errors when recording names.
Cultural Spellings
It was not unusual at all to have had an Englishman enumerating the German
names, Italian names, and Slavic names; you may have a Frenchman enumerating
the German names, or a German enumerating the English and French names. Try
an experiment with the common name of "Smith." Pronounce it with the accent
spoken by a native of a particular cultural background. We come up with the
following spellings based on those pronunciations: "Smith," "Smythe," "Schmith,"
"Schymthe," "Smite," "Smithee" and so forth. All of the above are actually found
as various spellings of the English "Smiths."
Phonics
Spelling by sound is the most common method of recording names. It is a
practice that still takes place today. The way a name appears on a census record
depended on how the name was said, how the enumerator heard it, and how he or
she interpreted it on paper. Many enumerators were not well-educated and mixed
guesswork with phonetic sounds to record what they heard.
Time Periods
The contemporary name "Polk" was spelled "Pollok" or "Pollock" several hundred
years ago. The name "Fisher" today was more frequently spelled "Pfisher" or
"Pfister" in early colonial America. Good researchers will always take into
consideration the "zone" or "time period" changes as they research their genealogy
or do other historical research. An excellent rule of thumb is this: "Just because
it is spelled one way today and has been for a long time, does not mean that
it was or has been spelled this way since the origin of the name."
Multiplying Letters
As researchers, we all too often look for the usual or ordinary. Quite often
we should be thinking of the unusual or out of the ordinary. The name "Booth"
is generally spelled with only two "o"s. In actuality it was spelled "Boooth"
by some enumerators. The name "Alexander" can and has been spelled "Allexxanndderr."
Another example would be the name "Briggs" as "Bbrriggss" or "Brriggss."
Reduction in the Use of Letters
While we have the one extreme of adding letters, we also have the other
extreme of the reduction of letters. To continue the example of the name of
"Briggs," it is often spelled "Brggs" or "Brgs", totally deleting the "i" and
the double letter. Here are a few other examples: "Green" as "Gren;" "Hannah"
as "Hanna" or "Hana;" "Allen" as "Alen;" "McAllister" as "McAlister;" and "Mitchell"
as "Mitcel" or "Mitchal."
Vowel Interchanging
The use of various vowels can place a name in an index many pages apart
from other names of the same species. Use these examples: "Myers," "Mires,"
"Meyers," "Maeyers" and "Miers" are all placed in an index, some close together
and some many pages apart. "Alexander" and "Elexander" not only would not be
found under the same first letter, but would appear in different sections of
an index. So the genealogical researcher should in many respects disregard vowels
when making name searches. Here are a few examples:
|
|
Jackson
|
|
Jacksen
|
|
Jacksin
|
|
|
Aldridge
|
|
Eldredge
|
|
Aldradge
|
|
|
Potter
|
|
Pottar
|
|
Pottaer
|
|
|
Allen
|
|
Allan
|
|
Allin
|
|
|
Cunningham
|
|
Cannengham
|
|
Cunninghum
|
Mis-Formed Letters or Look-Alike Letters
In one instance, researchers misread the name "Lebello" as "Sebello." The
"L" and "S" are quite often written identically, making it difficult for even
handwriting experts to tell the difference. The "I" and "J" can also be difficult
to distinguish when just written as initials. In addition, an open-topped "a"
can be mistaken for a "u," or a close-topped "u" or open-topped "o" can all
be confused with each other. The possible combinations are unlimited.
|
|
Hall
|
|
Hull
|
|
Holl
|
|
|
Baldwin
|
|
Boldwin
|
|
Buldwin
|
|
|
Tally
|
|
Tully
|
|
Tolly
|
Single Name Factor
Until the last part of the 19th century, many cultures only used one name
for a person. In addition, many religious orders only gave their members one
name. These practices make it difficult to index names using the current two-name
convention that most cultures use. If only a first name was obtainable from
the census, it will not appear in the Index. However, single
surnames will appear.
An individual whose name was "Cunningham" could be indexed in
any of the following ways:
|
|
Cunningham,
|
|
???? Cunningham
|
|
Cunningham
|
Whenever a first name appeared in conjunction with any portion
of a surname, such as "John D.," it was included in this data collection. Depending
on how the original name appeared, it could be indexed in any of the following
ways:
|
|
D, John
|
|
D?, John
|
|
D???, John
|
Titles and Other Name Designations
The almost endless range of titles includes military rank, occupation, ranking
in the family, government stations, religious, and many more. In data collections
containing census information, most titles appear in front of the given name,
but do not affect name alphabetization. Thus, "Lieutenant John Smith" would
appear as "Smith, Lieutenant John." He would be listed next to all of the other
individuals named "Smith, John," rather than next to those whose first names
started with "L." As a side note, "Doctor" was not only an occupational title,
but was sometimes a legal first name in the 19th century.
Titles that normally come after a name, such as "Sr.," "Jr.,"
"II," or "Esq." appear after the given name. For example, "John Smith, Jr."
would appear as "Smith, John, Jr."
Listing of Ethnic Names
This broad category of names includes American Indians, Chinese, Japanese,
Spanish, and Mexicans, among others. The methods used to index these names can
vary greatly. Some examples include the following:
| |
Original |
|
Method 1 |
|
Method 2 |
|
Method 3 |
|
|
Intawba |
|
Intawba, |
|
???, Intawba |
|
Indian, Intawba |
|
|
Chow
|
|
Chow,
|
|
???, Chow
|
|
|
|
|
Ching-Lee
|
|
Ching-Lee,
|
|
???, Ching-Lee
|
|
Chinglee
|
|
|
Hannamaimai
|
|
Hannamaimai,
|
|
???, Hannamaimai
|
|
|
People Listed in Religious Orders
The names of individuals in religious orders can be difficult to find, because
the individuals frequently took names other than their legal birth names, or
they chose to use only one of their names. Following are examples of how religious
order names may have been indexed:
|
|
Rev. James Hanson |
|
Hanson, Rev. James |
|
Rev. Rector Hanson |
|
|
Sister Anthony
|
|
Sister, Anthony
|
|
Anthony, Sister
|
|
|
Sister Mary
|
|
Sister, Mary
|
|
Mary, Sister
|
|
|
Brother John |
|
Brother, John |
|
John, Brother |
|
|
Father Johnson
|
|
Father, Johnson
|
|
Johnson, Father
|
Nicknames and Variations
It is quite common to call an individual by a much shorter name than what
they were given at birth. The following examples give the real names and the
possible nicknames:
|
|
Elizabeth Thomas |
|
Bess Thomas |
|
|
Daniel Jones
|
|
Danl Jones
|
|
|
Benjamin Smith
|
|
Benny Smith
|
|
|
William Brown |
|
Will Brown |
|
|
Anastasia Lee
|
|
Mousy Lee
|
However, never assume that all nicknames are short for a longer given name.
"Bess," "Liz," "Ben," "Freddy" are all very real given names.
Voluntary and Involuntary Information
Several types of mistakes resulted when individuals purposefully or unknowingly
gave the census enumerators incorrect information. For example, some Germanic
people remembered the compulsory military service requirements of the old country
and did not know the laws in America. They often felt that if they divulged
their correct names and ages they would be inducted into US military service.
To avoid being located, they would often use their middle name(s), delete their
first names or surnames, or use only their christening names. Albert Martin
Frederick Nass could thus appear in the records under the following variations:
|
|
Albert Nass |
|
Martin Frederick |
|
|
Albert Martin
|
|
Frederick Nass
|
|
|
Frederick Martin
|
|
Martin Nass
|
|
|
Albert Frederick |
|
|
Since the enumerators were being paid by the number of names they gathered,
they did not always take the data from a member of the household they were enumerating.
Many enumerators traveled long distances on foot, so when they came to an empty
dwelling it was common practice to have a neighbor volunteer the information.
This practice compounds the errors made on the original census manuscripts,
and perpetuated by indexers or researchers. Here is an example of the actual
information given by the individuals themselves, and what the neighbor reported:
| Example of information given by the individual |
|
|
Thomas James Baldwin |
|
M
|
|
28-years old |
|
born in Ohio |
|
|
Mary Francis Baldwin
|
|
F
|
|
26-years old |
|
born in Ohio
|
|
|
Thomas D. Baldwin |
|
M
|
|
6/12-years old |
|
born in Kansas |
|
|
John C. Baldwin
|
|
M
|
|
5-years old |
|
born in Kansas
|
|
|
Bella E. Baldwin |
|
F
|
|
3-years old |
|
born in Kansas |
|
|
Rosella A. Baldwin |
|
F
|
|
2-years old |
|
born in Illinois |
| Example of information given by the individual's neighbor |
|
|
Thomas Baldwin |
|
M
|
|
31-years old |
|
born in Pennsylvania |
|
|
Mary Baldwin
|
|
F
|
|
33-years old |
|
born in Maryland
|
|
|
Tom Baldwin Jun. |
|
M
|
|
2-years old |
|
born in Kansas |
|
|
J. Baldwin
|
|
M
|
|
9-years old |
|
born in Ohio
|
|
|
Bell Baldwin |
|
F
|
|
7-years old |
|
born in Ohio |
|
|
Rose Baldwin |
|
F
|
|
3-years old |
|
born in Ohio |
As you can see, the information provided by the neighbor was somewhere within
the realm of truth, but by no means accurate.
Changing Names
Since the colonization of America in the early 1600's it has been a common
practice for individuals, and especially immigrants to change their names. However,
it was not until the mid-19th century or later that people were required to
officially register their changed names in a court of law. (An examination of
the Enumeration Returns for the 1890 Census of Veterans and Widows of the Wars
reveals that hundreds, if not thousands, of men and women entered the United
States Armed Forces under one name, and sometime after their military obligation
was up, the census indicated that they had lived under an assumed name or names.)
It's not uncommon to find individuals listed under three or four names.
We give the following examples:
| Edward Brown |
alias
|
Ed Benson |
|
Jonathan Williams
|
alias
|
John Wilson |
| Benjamin Green |
alias
|
Benjamin Hanks |
|
Margaret Benson
|
alias
|
Sarah Timms |
| Fredrick Johnson |
alias
|
Aaron Carter |
| James T. Lockhart |
alias
|
Thomas Smith |
| Catharine Welsh |
alias
|
Eliza Robinson |
Online data collections are a wonderful way for you and your family to reduce
the amount of time needed to discover your ancestors. We hope that online data
will help you focus your library trips, official correspondence, and record
browsing down to the exact documents you need. We produce these collections with
the hope that they'll make researching your family history as easily as possible.
While we certainly encourage you to share your interest in family history with
others, you should know that some types of sharing are illegal. That's because,
just like books and movies, software programs are protected by US copyright
law. Since online data collections are among the materials to which US laws and international
treaties apply, Genealogy.com expects subscribers to respect the conditions
for use that are allowed by these laws. So, with all the benefits you can gain
from online data collections, there also come some responsibilities.
Here, we'll present some appropriate and inappropriate uses of online data
and you'll learn how to make the best use of these resources. For example, can
you rent out your online data? Is it okay to look up other people's ancestors
for them? Read on and find out.
First of all, since data collections often contain information that can be
found in libraries and on public record, you might wonder how we can claim ownership
of genealogical material or prohibit people from distributing it freely.
The fact is, nobody can own the historical information itself. Instead, publishers
(such as Genealogy.com) earn copyright protection by adding value to the bare
facts. Publishers start with information available in public or private record
and add value to that data. For example, we add value to genealogical data by:
- Selecting which records and data fields to compile
- Filling in missing or incomplete areas by merging sources
- Interpreting ambiguous information
- Arranging their compilation in a unique format
- Adding retrieval software to make the data easy to search
- Scanning the original documents for viewing, printing, and downloading.
Basically, we help minimize the barriers between you and the family history
information you seek. US copyright laws protect the use of information published
in indexes, abstracts, interpretations, and search engines, even if they don't
apply to the original data. Because online data collections are entitled to this protection,
and because Genealogy.com has paid considerable costs for their development,
we rely on copyright law to help safeguard that investment.
We understand that family history research is something that families and friends
enjoy doing together. It would be unrealistic for us to expect family members
to buy more than one copy of a subscription when they could be pooling their
money and using it to purchase other data and do more research. At
the same time, we need to enforce the legal limits on how much sharing you do
with your subscriptions because our business and ability to publish resources
depends on people's desire to purchase subscriptions of their own.
For your own research, of course, you may use any and all data from a Family
Archive that you've purchased. If you have an opportunity to collaborate with
others, that collaboration can be a great advantage as long as you adhere to
certain guidelines set up under copyright law.
Copyright law permits sharing of "small quantities" of data with family members
and friends, and if applicable, with clients of your professional genealogical
services. "Small quantities" means specific pieces of information. For example,
it is okay to share information about a nuclear family (a mother, father, sister,
or brother) with a fellow researcher or to provide the names of all individuals
with the same first or last name living in a certain county in a certain decade.
You may also share complete information about one individual that you find using
your subscription.
The key thing to remember is that it's okay to use your subscription to help
someone else quickly fill in a small blank in their family research. If they
want to rely on your subscriptions for anything more than a name here or a
date there, however, they should buy their own copies to use.
In the course of collaboration, you're likely to run into situations where something
seems okay but you're not quite sure. Keeping the "Fair Use" doctrine of the
US copyright law in mind will help you determine how to make the right decision
in a questionable situation.
"Fair Use" is a compromise between having very strict interpretations of copyright
protection and having no restrictions at all. "Fair Use" is determined by the
following four standards:
|
1. PURPOSE
|
|
The purpose and character of the use, including
whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational
purposes. |
|
|
If it is for commercial gain, to make a
profit, it may be unfair. |
|
|
If it is for non-profit or educational purposes,
it may be fair. |
| 2. NATURE |
|
The nature of the copyrighted work. |
| |
|
To warrant copyright protection, a work
must be original and creative. |
| 3. AMOUNT |
|
The amount and substantiality of the portion
used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole. |
| |
|
The used portion of the work must not be
too large compared to the entire work. |
| 4. EFFECT |
|
The effect of the use upon the potential
market for value of the copyrighted work. |
| |
|
Must not harm the potential market for,
or value of, the work. |
Sharing small quantities of a copyrighted material is permitted, but if a publisher
perceives that copyright protection is being violated, he can bring legal action
against the alleged person or company. Judges use the four rules of "Fair Use"
to determine whether a copyright has been violated. Generally, courts are more
lenient towards educational and nonprofit use of copyrighted materials than
they are towards commercial enterprises. That's why, for example, libraries
may be allowed to let many different patrons share the same published materials.
Keeping the four rules of "Fair Use" in mind will help you make the best use
of your subscriptions in questionable situations.
To illustrate what would not be considered "Fair Use," the next section gives
some examples of copyright abuse.
We hope you'll agree that continued access to valuable genealogical resources
is in the common interest of all researchers. Since companies like ours will
only be able to continue publishing genealogical resources as long as it makes
sense economically, we must insist that you be conscientious in sharing your
data and that you observe copyright law.
Before sharing or copying data from your subscriptions, please understand
that the following activities are illegal:
- Systematically making a subscription freely available to more than one
person at a time.
- Systematically making large parts (i.e. the whole collection or the
results of more than two or three blanket searches) of a data collection's
contents freely available to others.
- Uploading all or part of a data collection's contents onto a web site.
- Circulating a printout taken straight off the data set.
Please remember that if someone wants to use your subscriptions for an undirected,
general search, they are clearly interested in doing research. That makes them
a potential Genealogy.com customer and sharing such large quantities of information
with that person would be a violation of "Fair Use."
Of course, there is still some open ground between what is appropriate to share
and what is inappropriate to share - we trust you to use your best judgment
when weighing such a decision. One thing to keep in mind is that when you share
large amounts of information with others, it shrinks the number of customers
who help pay the costs involved in producing online data collections. We price Family
Archives at very reasonable levels with the expectation that most of the people
who want to use them will purchase their own copies. When subscribers
ignore their responsibility, it makes it more difficult to renew the resources
needed to keep bringing valuable data to family historians.
- Can I charge people a fee to let them use my subscriptions?
No, you may not rent out your subscriptions. Such use, especially if
you publicize an offer, is a violation of "Fair Use" because it harms the
potential market for online data collections. The more people you try to attract with
your offer of renting your subscriptions, the clearer your intention to
profit is shown, and the greater your violation of our copyright.
You can, however, charge people a fee for your research services if you look
up information for them on your subscription and use it to compile an overall
family history for them. That's because (just like we add value to the original
data by publishing it in an easy-to-use format) you are adding your own value
to the information by compiling an original family history. If you're creating
a pedigree, assembling a list of someone's relatives, or tracking all records
for a "Katherine Conrad of Ohio," for example, then it's appropriate to use
your subscriptions as much and as often as you need to.
Just be sure that the information you deliver to your client is originally
yours. The information should not be copied electronically off the Family
Archive (such as a screen download or printout) because that requires no expertise,
takes only mechanical effort, and does not add any value to the copyrighted
work. Asking someone to pay for a screen shot is so similar to renting your
subscription that it can't be considered "Fair Use."
- What if my neighbor wants to look up her grandmother on my subscription?
That's fine. Your neighbor has a specific person in mind to search for and
she'll only be using a tiny portion of the data from your subscription.
If she later buys a different subscription of her own, hopefully she'll
return the favor and let you do a search or two!
- Can I use my subscriptions to answer a search request on an electronic
bulletin board?
No. Posting the results of a broad search on an electronic bulletin board
is always a violation of copyright because the information is distributed
to a large number of people. On the other hand, if you and another specific
person want to use e-mail to communicate with each other, it's fine to share
small quantities of specific data from your subscriptions. As long as your
messages aren't being broadcast to an entire bulletin board community, e-mail
can be a real time-saver for checking and finding family history facts quickly.
- Is Genealogy.com Serious?
Yes. Genealogy.com actively protects its rights wherever copyright abuse might
have a measurable negative impact on the company's business interests. Genealogy.com's
foundation for copyright protection of online data collections is solid. When the
company has cause for legal action against violators of its copyright, it
will not hesitate to pursue such action.
|
 |