Yes, I have a place for George and Nathan Rochell(e) Fly in my hypothesis.I'd like to prove it or disprove my ideas on this.I'll accept pertinent documents. Again you're criticising me for things NOT in dispute; you are putting me in positions NOT of my making.It's downright BIZARRE reading your copy so at variance it is from ANYTHING sensible and logical and really at issue.
The question, my dear BLIND woman, is, "Were the Orphans the children of George or Nathan R.?" _ What are the DATES of the orphan records?What specific source, if this is a Record and not an Index of the Record? SOME facts REVEAL information; SOME are irrelevant.
Don't keep saying you sent me the Orphan records.You have NOT in 15 years.If it was before that, you'll simply HAVE TO overlook my poor filing system, relating to my early to middle correspondence years.I have THOUSANDS of fact from well-intentioned fact-suppliers over the years. I do not guarantee any fact-supplier that I will instantly recognize and make the utmost use of a particular fact at the time it is supplied. A REASONABLE correspondent can accept this, - why not you?
I remain disappointed that you don't WANT to be a team player, or else you simply CANNOT.