JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
Descendants of JOHN HALL
1.JOHN1 HALL was born 1605 in WARWICKSHIRE, MANCHESTER DISTRICT, ENGLAND, and died May 03, 1676 in WALLINGFORD, CT.He married JANE WOOLEN 1644 in WALLINGFORD, NEW HAVEN, CT, daughter of JOHN WOOLEN.She was born 1622 in ENGLAND, and died November 14, 1690 in WALLINGFORD, CT.
1.JOHN1 HALL was born 1605 in WARWICKSHIRE, MANCHESTER DISTRICT, ENGLAND, and died May 03, 1676 in WALLINGFORD, CT.He married JANE WOOLEN 1644 in WALLINGFORD, NEW HAVEN, CT, daughter of JOHN WOOLEN.She was born 1622 in ENGLAND, and died November 14, 1690 in WALLINGFORD, CT.Notes for JOHN HALL:
Notes for JOHN HALL:This information was gathered from the following sources at the Poughkeepsie, NY Genealogy Library:
This information was gathered from the following sources at the Poughkeepsie, NY Genealogy Library:1. Connecticut Historical Collections containing a General collection of Interesting facts, Traditions, Biographical Sketches, Anecdotes, Etc. Relating to the History and Antiquities of Every Town in Connecticut with Geographical Descriptions by John Warner Barber.
2. Records of the Colony and Plantation of New Haven from 1638 to 1649 by Charles J. Hoadley, M.A.
3. Ruf, Haight, Eddy, Sumner, Hatch and Allied Families Genealogical and Biographical by Alpha H. Ruf.
2. Records of the Colony and Plantation of New Haven from 1638 to 1649 by Charles J. Hoadley, M.A.
3. Ruf, Haight, Eddy, Sumner, Hatch and Allied Families Genealogical and Biographical by Alpha H. Ruf.
John Hall is the earliest documented ancestor of the Hall line dating back to his birth in 1606 of the Manchester district of England.He died on 5/3/1676 in Wallingford, New Haven, Connecticut.Documents show John was in Cambridge, Massachusetts around 1630, probably arriving with the Hooker Party of 1632.
John Hall is the earliest documented ancestor of the Hall line dating back to his birth in 1606 of the Manchester district of England.He died on 5/3/1676 in Wallingford, New Haven, Connecticut.Documents show John was in Cambridge, Massachusetts around 1630, probably arriving with the Hooker Party of 1632.Dr. Trumbull says, "About the beginning of June 1636, Messrs, Hooker and Stone, with their company, came through the wilderness to Hartford, Connecticut.They traveled more than a hundred miles, through a hideous and trackless wilderness.They had no guide but their compass, and made their way over mountains, through swamps, thickets, and rivers, which were not passable but with great difficulty.They had no cover but the heavens, nor any lodgings but those that simple nature afforded them.They drove with them a hundred and sixty head of cattle, and by the way subsisted on the milk of their cows.Mrs. Hooker was borne through the wilderness upon a litter. The people carried their packs, arms, and some utensils.They were nearly a fortnight on their journey."There were at the close of this year, about 250 men in the three towns on the river.The whole consisted of about 800 persons or one hundred seventy families.
Dr. Trumbull says, "About the beginning of June 1636, Messrs, Hooker and Stone, with their company, came through the wilderness to Hartford, Connecticut.They traveled more than a hundred miles, through a hideous and trackless wilderness.They had no guide but their compass, and made their way over mountains, through swamps, thickets, and rivers, which were not passable but with great difficulty.They had no cover but the heavens, nor any lodgings but those that simple nature afforded them.They drove with them a hundred and sixty head of cattle, and by the way subsisted on the milk of their cows.Mrs. Hooker was borne through the wilderness upon a litter. The people carried their packs, arms, and some utensils.They were nearly a fortnight on their journey."There were at the close of this year, about 250 men in the three towns on the river.The whole consisted of about 800 persons or one hundred seventy families.Connecticut derives its name from the river by which it is intersected, called by the natives Quonektacut; this word according to some, signifies the long river. However been stated by others, that meaning of the word is River of Pines, in allusion to the forest of pines that formerly stood on its banks.
Connecticut derives its name from the river by which it is intersected, called by the natives Quonektacut; this word according to some, signifies the long river. However been stated by others, that meaning of the word is River of Pines, in allusion to the forest of pines that formerly stood on its banks.The next mention of John Hall is his participation in the Pequot War in May and June of 1637 as a soldier from Hartford, Connecticut, at the age of 31.The year 1637 is memorable in the history of Connecticut due to the Pequot War and the destruction of that warlike tribe.In the year 1634 a number of Indians, in confederation with the Pequots, murdered Capt. Stone and Capt. Nathan, with the whole of their crew consisting of eight men and plundered and sunk the vessel.In 1636, Capt. Oldham was killed at Block Island, where he went to trade; several of the murderers fled to the Pequots and were protected by them; and they were therefore considered as the abettors of the murder.
The next mention of John Hall is his participation in the Pequot War in May and June of 1637 as a soldier from Hartford, Connecticut, at the age of 31.The year 1637 is memorable in the history of Connecticut due to the Pequot War and the destruction of that warlike tribe.In the year 1634 a number of Indians, in confederation with the Pequots, murdered Capt. Stone and Capt. Nathan, with the whole of their crew consisting of eight men and plundered and sunk the vessel.In 1636, Capt. Oldham was killed at Block Island, where he went to trade; several of the murderers fled to the Pequots and were protected by them; and they were therefore considered as the abettors of the murder.Massachusetts sent ninety men to reduce the Indians and demand the murderers and a thousand fathoms of wampum for damages and a number of their children as hostages.As the soldiers approached, the Indians secreted themselves and could not be found.Capt Endicott destroyed about sixty wigwams and about two hundred acres of corn.When spring arrived, the Pequots kept the whole colony in a state of alarm, they could neither hunt, fish or cultivate their fields, but at the peril of there lives. On the 1st of May, a court was held and it was determined that offensive war should be carried out immediately against them
Massachusetts sent ninety men to reduce the Indians and demand the murderers and a thousand fathoms of wampum for damages and a number of their children as hostages.As the soldiers approached, the Indians secreted themselves and could not be found.Capt Endicott destroyed about sixty wigwams and about two hundred acres of corn.When spring arrived, the Pequots kept the whole colony in a state of alarm, they could neither hunt, fish or cultivate their fields, but at the peril of there lives. On the 1st of May, a court was held and it was determined that offensive war should be carried out immediately against themOn 5/10/1637, CT's force consisted of 90 Englishmen and they were accompanied by seventy friendly Mohegan Indians and were joined by troops form Plymouth and about two hundred Narragansett Indians.On 5/26/1637 a successful surprise attack against the Pequots was carried out.It was said that the screams of the Pequot men , women and children being burned alive in their wigwams haunted these soldiers the remainder of their lives, leaving them to feel they had committed a great sin against their fellow man and God.The pursuit of the Pequots west to the lands on the CT seacoast gaverise to many migrating to this part of the country, as they felt it would make a fine settlement.Also the prospect that they could form a government that would be most agreeable to them.
On 5/10/1637, CT's force consisted of 90 Englishmen and they were accompanied by seventy friendly Mohegan Indians and were joined by troops form Plymouth and about two hundred Narragansett Indians.On 5/26/1637 a successful surprise attack against the Pequots was carried out.It was said that the screams of the Pequot men , women and children being burned alive in their wigwams haunted these soldiers the remainder of their lives, leaving them to feel they had committed a great sin against their fellow man and God.The pursuit of the Pequots west to the lands on the CT seacoast gaverise to many migrating to this part of the country, as they felt it would make a fine settlement.Also the prospect that they could form a government that would be most agreeable to them.On June 4, 1639, John moved from Hartford to New Haven where he was among the first signers of the New Haven Planter's Covenant, which was an agreement made in a general meeting of all the free planters in New Haven.It was ordered by all the free planters that all those that hereafter should be received as planters into the plantation of New Haven should also agree to the said fundamental agreement and testify the same by subscribing their names under the names of the aforesaid planters.John Hall's autograph signature appears in the second group of names on the Colonial records of New Haven.The first group shows the name of Francis Hall, who appears to be John's brother.
On June 4, 1639, John moved from Hartford to New Haven where he was among the first signers of the New Haven Planter's Covenant, which was an agreement made in a general meeting of all the free planters in New Haven.It was ordered by all the free planters that all those that hereafter should be received as planters into the plantation of New Haven should also agree to the said fundamental agreement and testify the same by subscribing their names under the names of the aforesaid planters.John Hall's autograph signature appears in the second group of names on the Colonial records of New Haven.The first group shows the name of Francis Hall, who appears to be John's brother.In 1642, the capital laws of Connecticut were nearly completed and put on record.There were twelve in number; two more were added at a later date, shown below are the two which were added later:
In 1642, the capital laws of Connecticut were nearly completed and put on record.There were twelve in number; two more were added at a later date, shown below are the two which were added later:13. If any child or children above 16 years of age and of sufficient understanding shall curse or smite their natural father or mother, he or they shall be put to death, unless it can be sufficiently testified that the parents have been very unchristianly negligent in the education of such children, or so provoke them by extreme and cruel corruption that they have been forced thereunto to preserve themselves from death, or injury.
13. If any child or children above 16 years of age and of sufficient understanding shall curse or smite their natural father or mother, he or they shall be put to death, unless it can be sufficiently testified that the parents have been very unchristianly negligent in the education of such children, or so provoke them by extreme and cruel corruption that they have been forced thereunto to preserve themselves from death, or injury.14.If any man have a stubborn and rebellious son of sufficient years and understanding, 16 years of age which will not obey the voice of his father or mother, and that when they have chastened whim will not hearken unto them then may his father or mother, being his natural parents, lay hold on him and bring him to the magistrates assembled in court and testify unto them, that their son is stubborn and rebellious and will not obey their voice and chastisement, but lives in sundry notorious crimes, such a son shall be put to death.
14.If any man have a stubborn and rebellious son of sufficient years and understanding, 16 years of age which will not obey the voice of his father or mother, and that when they have chastened whim will not hearken unto them then may his father or mother, being his natural parents, lay hold on him and bring him to the magistrates assembled in court and testify unto them, that their son is stubborn and rebellious and will not obey their voice and chastisement, but lives in sundry notorious crimes, such a son shall be put to death.Shortly after establishing himself in New Haven John met Jean Woolen, daughter of John and sister of John Woolen, Jr. of New Haven.Jean was serving a five-year indenture wherein she was bound to William Wilkes of New Haven in the capacity of maidservant to his wife.It is also known that during this time John was working in the capacity of servant to John Megs, shoemaker, probably as an apprentice shoemaker.It appears John agreed to reimburse Mr. Wilkes for the cost of Jean's passage to allow her freedom to marry, but Mr. Wilkes requested that Jean serve out her time for which she would be paid the additional sum of 10 pounds, and to this both parties agreed.John and Jean were married about 1644 and their son John was born on 7/11/1645.
Shortly after establishing himself in New Haven John met Jean Woolen, daughter of John and sister of John Woolen, Jr. of New Haven.Jean was serving a five-year indenture wherein she was bound to William Wilkes of New Haven in the capacity of maidservant to his wife.It is also known that during this time John was working in the capacity of servant to John Megs, shoemaker, probably as an apprentice shoemaker.It appears John agreed to reimburse Mr. Wilkes for the cost of Jean's passage to allow her freedom to marry, but Mr. Wilkes requested that Jean serve out her time for which she would be paid the additional sum of 10 pounds, and to this both parties agreed.John and Jean were married about 1644 and their son John was born on 7/11/1645.Jean's brother, John Woolen, servant to Mr. Lamberton (and his interpreter between him and the Indians), was committed to prison in irons, and he himself said the governor had put them upon him with his own hands.He was summoned to a court held at New Haven on 8/2/1643, and testified that the governor had requested him.He was brought into a room in which the governors wife, Timothy the barber and the watch master came to him and brought wine and strong beer and gave him, with a purpose, as he conceived to have made him drunk.
Jean's brother, John Woolen, servant to Mr. Lamberton (and his interpreter between him and the Indians), was committed to prison in irons, and he himself said the governor had put them upon him with his own hands.He was summoned to a court held at New Haven on 8/2/1643, and testified that the governor had requested him.He was brought into a room in which the governors wife, Timothy the barber and the watch master came to him and brought wine and strong beer and gave him, with a purpose, as he conceived to have made him drunk.After he was drunk, the Governor sent for him into his own chamber and gave him more wine and strong beer, and he drank freely with him, entertaining of him with much respect seemingly, and with profession of a great deal of love to him.The Governor made many large promises do very much good for him if he would but say that George Lamberton had hired the Indians to cut off the Sweeds, but John Woolen denied it.Again the Governor offered him his freedom, a plantation, and to build him a house and he should not want for gold or silver, if he would but say as is said before.He said he could do more for him than anyone, and he loved him as his own child.John answered that he would not say so if it were not true, even if he gave him his house full of gold.
After he was drunk, the Governor sent for him into his own chamber and gave him more wine and strong beer, and he drank freely with him, entertaining of him with much respect seemingly, and with profession of a great deal of love to him.The Governor made many large promises do very much good for him if he would but say that George Lamberton had hired the Indians to cut off the Sweeds, but John Woolen denied it.Again the Governor offered him his freedom, a plantation, and to build him a house and he should not want for gold or silver, if he would but say as is said before.He said he could do more for him than anyone, and he loved him as his own child.John answered that he would not say so if it were not true, even if he gave him his house full of gold.Upon hearing this, the Governor then became exceeding angry, and threatened him very much, and stamped his feet and called for his irons, he put them upon him with his own hands, and sent him down to prison as before is expressed.Later the watchman came into the prison, and brought strong beer and drunk with him about two hours in the night.Once again, the watchman pressed him again to say as is said before, and he should be free from his irons presently, but John Woolen said he would not say it if he should be hanged, drawn and quartered.He said he would not be responsible for taking away the life of a man that was innocent.The outcome of this hearing is unknown.
Upon hearing this, the Governor then became exceeding angry, and threatened him very much, and stamped his feet and called for his irons, he put them upon him with his own hands, and sent him down to prison as before is expressed.Later the watchman came into the prison, and brought strong beer and drunk with him about two hours in the night.Once again, the watchman pressed him again to say as is said before, and he should be free from his irons presently, but John Woolen said he would not say it if he should be hanged, drawn and quartered.He said he would not be responsible for taking away the life of a man that was innocent.The outcome of this hearing is unknown.A court held in New Haven in 1647 has John Hall pleading for a portion of Mr. Wilkes estate in the amount of then pounds, due to her by promise, which was testified to by William Paine and Bridget Wilkes upon oath.William Paine, affirmed that the first time he heard his master Mr. Wilkes speak of this was in Boston, that if his maid would stay out her time, he would give her ten pounds and this he heard him say often before the servants in the house.On 7/4/1648, at a court held at New Haven, John Hall again demanded out of the estate of Mr. Wilkes, ten pounds as a portion promised by Mr. Wilkes to his wife, who was his servant, as he then proved by two witnesses.He now presenteth Jonathan Marsh, who testified upon oath that Mr. Wilkes declared to him shortly before going to England that he had promised his maid Jean Woolen a portion and made a motion of marriage to him concerning her.
A court held in New Haven in 1647 has John Hall pleading for a portion of Mr. Wilkes estate in the amount of then pounds, due to her by promise, which was testified to by William Paine and Bridget Wilkes upon oath.William Paine, affirmed that the first time he heard his master Mr. Wilkes speak of this was in Boston, that if his maid would stay out her time, he would give her ten pounds and this he heard him say often before the servants in the house.On 7/4/1648, at a court held at New Haven, John Hall again demanded out of the estate of Mr. Wilkes, ten pounds as a portion promised by Mr. Wilkes to his wife, who was his servant, as he then proved by two witnesses.He now presenteth Jonathan Marsh, who testified upon oath that Mr. Wilkes declared to him shortly before going to England that he had promised his maid Jean Woolen a portion and made a motion of marriage to him concerning her.Later in 1648, John Hall again renewed his desire that the court would put an issue to it and his wife, being present was asked why her master Wilkes promised her ten pounds if she served out her time, she said because he knew she deserved it.The indenture wherein she was bound to Mr. Wilkes was called for and read in court, wherein it appeared that she was to serve him for five years and to have three pounds a year, which was judged competent wages, her passage also paid for by Mr. Wilkes.But he having promised and engaged himself to do it, as appears fully by testimony of witnesses upon oath, therefore, the sentence of the court is that Mr. Robert Newman, executor of his estate pay to John Hall as a debt due from Mr. Wilkes to his wife ten pounds.Mr. Wilkes' home and property was valued and sold for forty pounds, which was payable in corn, cattle or wampum, to give the reader an idea of the value ten pounds (his land was valued at ten pounds and the house thirty pounds).
Later in 1648, John Hall again renewed his desire that the court would put an issue to it and his wife, being present was asked why her master Wilkes promised her ten pounds if she served out her time, she said because he knew she deserved it.The indenture wherein she was bound to Mr. Wilkes was called for and read in court, wherein it appeared that she was to serve him for five years and to have three pounds a year, which was judged competent wages, her passage also paid for by Mr. Wilkes.But he having promised and engaged himself to do it, as appears fully by testimony of witnesses upon oath, therefore, the sentence of the court is that Mr. Robert Newman, executor of his estate pay to John Hall as a debt due from Mr. Wilkes to his wife ten pounds.Mr. Wilkes' home and property was valued and sold for forty pounds, which was payable in corn, cattle or wampum, to give the reader an idea of the value ten pounds (his land was valued at ten pounds and the house thirty pounds).At a court hearing in 1648, John Hall servant to John Megs testified upon oath that Mrs. Perry had a pair of shoes of his masters, and said she had no money at that time about her.John Megs said it should go as payment for the barn and she said well, well, seeming to be willing that it should be so.William Hooke testified that Mr. Perry came to Mr. Megs for a pair of shoes, he said he had no wampum to pay at present, Mr. Megs said let them go in part payment of the barn.The court delayed their decision on this hearing until Mr. Perry could show what he received the previous year for the barn.
At a court hearing in 1648, John Hall servant to John Megs testified upon oath that Mrs. Perry had a pair of shoes of his masters, and said she had no money at that time about her.John Megs said it should go as payment for the barn and she said well, well, seeming to be willing that it should be so.William Hooke testified that Mr. Perry came to Mr. Megs for a pair of shoes, he said he had no wampum to pay at present, Mr. Megs said let them go in part payment of the barn.The court delayed their decision on this hearing until Mr. Perry could show what he received the previous year for the barn.John Hall's name was listed as a tenant of the subdivided property in Oyster Shell beginning 3/10/1648 showing he was given two acres.Wallingford originally belonged to New Haven and before it was incorporated as a town it was called New Haven Village.Gov. Eaton, Mr. Davenport, and other planters of New Haven purchased the town on Dec. 1638, with a settlement date of 1669.A committee was appointed by the town of New Haven, vested with powers to manage the whole affairs of the settlement.This committee held the land in trust and acted in all the affairs of the town as trustees until May 1672 when they resigned their trust to the town.
John Hall's name was listed as a tenant of the subdivided property in Oyster Shell beginning 3/10/1648 showing he was given two acres.Wallingford originally belonged to New Haven and before it was incorporated as a town it was called New Haven Village.Gov. Eaton, Mr. Davenport, and other planters of New Haven purchased the town on Dec. 1638, with a settlement date of 1669.A committee was appointed by the town of New Haven, vested with powers to manage the whole affairs of the settlement.This committee held the land in trust and acted in all the affairs of the town as trustees until May 1672 when they resigned their trust to the town.Tradition states that the Rev. Davenport of New Haven preached the first sermon in Wallingford at the bottom of the hill on which the town stands from these words in Isaiah v.1."My beloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill".On 2/15/1675, the town voted unanimously to leave the management of the same in the hands of Mr. Moss, Samuel Street, Mr. Brocket, Eliasaph Preston, John Hall, Sr., John Hall, Jr., Thomas Yale, Nehemiah Royce, Nathan Andrews, Benjamin Lewis, Lt. Merriman, Sgt. Doolittle and John Beach.
Tradition states that the Rev. Davenport of New Haven preached the first sermon in Wallingford at the bottom of the hill on which the town stands from these words in Isaiah v.1."My beloved hath a vineyard in a very fruitful hill".On 2/15/1675, the town voted unanimously to leave the management of the same in the hands of Mr. Moss, Samuel Street, Mr. Brocket, Eliasaph Preston, John Hall, Sr., John Hall, Jr., Thomas Yale, Nehemiah Royce, Nathan Andrews, Benjamin Lewis, Lt. Merriman, Sgt. Doolittle and John Beach.In 1665 at the age of 60, John was released from his squadron and from performing mandatory general training.He died on March 3, 1676 making an oral will on his deathbed.
In 1665 at the age of 60, John was released from his squadron and from performing mandatory general training.He died on March 3, 1676 making an oral will on his deathbed.In 1685 King Charles II died and was succeeded by the Duke of York who took the title of King James ll.The oppression of Charles was increased rather than diminished by James who was a tyrant and a bigoted Catholic.It was the object of those in power at that time, to procure a surrender of all the patents of the colonies, and form a whole northern part of American into twelve provinces, with a governor-general over the whole.In 1687, Sir Edmund Andross was appointed the first governor-general over New England, and arrived at Boston 12/19/1686.He immediately wrote to the governor and company of Connecticut, to resign their charter, but without success.
In 1685 King Charles II died and was succeeded by the Duke of York who took the title of King James ll.The oppression of Charles was increased rather than diminished by James who was a tyrant and a bigoted Catholic.It was the object of those in power at that time, to procure a surrender of all the patents of the colonies, and form a whole northern part of American into twelve provinces, with a governor-general over the whole.In 1687, Sir Edmund Andross was appointed the first governor-general over New England, and arrived at Boston 12/19/1686.He immediately wrote to the governor and company of Connecticut, to resign their charter, but without success.In 10/1687, Andross with a company of soldiers arrived at Hartford, and demanded a surrender of their charter.The charter was produced, and while the officers of the government were debating with Andross on the subject, the lights were extinguished, and the charter was seized and secreted in a hollow oak.Andross, proceeded to take formal possession of the government, and appointed officers, civil and military.It was then declared that Indian deeds were no better than " the scratch of a bear's paw".The proprietors of lands, after fifty and sixty years of improvement of the soil, were obliged in many instances to take out new patents for their estates, for which a heavy fee was demanded.
In 10/1687, Andross with a company of soldiers arrived at Hartford, and demanded a surrender of their charter.The charter was produced, and while the officers of the government were debating with Andross on the subject, the lights were extinguished, and the charter was seized and secreted in a hollow oak.Andross, proceeded to take formal possession of the government, and appointed officers, civil and military.It was then declared that Indian deeds were no better than " the scratch of a bear's paw".The proprietors of lands, after fifty and sixty years of improvement of the soil, were obliged in many instances to take out new patents for their estates, for which a heavy fee was demanded.Soon after King James had rendered himself so odious in England, he was obliged to flee from the kingdom.Upon the news of the revolution, on April 18, 1689, the inhabitants of Boston and its vicinity rose in arms, made themselves masters of the castle, arrested Sir Edmund Andross and his council and persuaded the old governor and council to resume the government.Connecticut obtained, from the most able lawyers in England, an opinion that the colony not having surrendered the charter under seal, and no judgment being entered on record, the charter was not invalidated, the former government was, therefore, reestablished.It is said that the "Charter Oak" is still standing today.
Soon after King James had rendered himself so odious in England, he was obliged to flee from the kingdom.Upon the news of the revolution, on April 18, 1689, the inhabitants of Boston and its vicinity rose in arms, made themselves masters of the castle, arrested Sir Edmund Andross and his council and persuaded the old governor and council to resume the government.Connecticut obtained, from the most able lawyers in England, an opinion that the colony not having surrendered the charter under seal, and no judgment being entered on record, the charter was not invalidated, the former government was, therefore, reestablished.It is said that the "Charter Oak" is still standing today.About this period great complaints were made in England against the colonies, for harboring pirates; and that no laws had been made against them.Soon after a law was enacted against it, and the notorious Capt. Kidd, who is still held in remembrance in all parts of Connecticut from the belief that he buried large sums of money on the coast near the banks of rivers was arrested.Kidd was commander of the sloop Antonio who received a commission to cruise as a privateer, turned pirate.He was found guilty of murder and sentence to death.
...............................
Children of JOHN HALL and JANE WOOLEN are:
i.THOMAS HALL, b. March 26, 1649,
ii.RICHARD HALL, b. July 11, 1645.
iii. JOHN HALL, b. August 09, 1646.
iv.SARAH HALL, b. August 09, 1646.
v.DANIEL HALL, b. 1647.
vi.SAMUEL HALL, b. May 26, 1648.
vii. JONATHAN HALL, b. April 05, 1651.
viii.DAVID HALL, b. March 18, 1651/52.
ix.MARY HALL, b. 1653.
...............................
Children of JOHN HALL and JANE WOOLEN are:
i.THOMAS HALL, b. March 26, 1649,
ii.RICHARD HALL, b. July 11, 1645.
iii. JOHN HALL, b. August 09, 1646.
iv.SARAH HALL, b. August 09, 1646.
v.DANIEL HALL, b. 1647.
vi.SAMUEL HALL, b. May 26, 1648.
vii. JONATHAN HALL, b. April 05, 1651.
viii.DAVID HALL, b. March 18, 1651/52.
ix.MARY HALL, b. 1653.
More Replies:
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
Jeff Hall 9/03/02
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
8/05/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
8/06/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
5/31/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
9/26/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
Jennifer Warren 9/25/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
9/26/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
10/04/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
10/30/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
3/18/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
10/04/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
7/22/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
7/13/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
Mary 8/02/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
gwen sackrison 10/03/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
8/06/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
gwen sackrison 8/07/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
8/07/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
gwen sackrison 8/07/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
8/20/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
8/20/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
10/04/99
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
6/23/00
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT
-
Re: JOHN HALL OF WALLINGFORD, CT