Re: Update: George and Ann (Birtles) Tootell Descendants, Lancashire > Aust.
-
In reply to:
Update: George and Ann (Birtles) Tootell Descendants, Lancashire > Aust.
G Lyon 7/21/04
possilbe family, only Tootells in Manchester
1841 England Census
Name: George Tootell
Age: 15
Estimated birth year: abt 1826
Gender: Male
Where born: Lancashire, England
Civil parish: Manchester
Hundred: Salford
County/Island: Lancashire
Country: England
Street Address: crossed out
Registration district: Manchester
Sub-registration district: St George
Household Members: Name Age -other all b in county
George Tootell 40 reed maker
George Tootell 15
Ann Tootell 40 not b in county
Mary Tootell 15 winder
Mary Tootell 15 weaver
*is one of the last 2 Ellen??
Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece 574; Book: 8; Civil Parish: Manchester; County: Lancashire; Enumeration District: 13; Folio: 17; Page: 29; Line: 6; GSU roll: 438726.
ages were rounded off to the nearest 5 years for those over 15 in the 1841 census in general
1851 England Census
Name: George Tootell
Age: 52
Estimated birth year: abt 1799
Relation: Head
Spouse's name: Ann
Gender: Male
Where born: Manchester, Lancashire, England
Civil parish: Manchester
Ecclesiastical parish: St George
County/Island: Lancashire
Country: England
Street Address: 57 Henry Street
Registration district: Manchester
Sub-registration district: Ancoats
ED, institution, or vessel: 1h
Household schedule number: 142
Household Members: Name Age -all b manchester
George Tootell 52 Reed maker
Ann Tootell 57 midwife
Ellen Tootell 7 grand daughter
Source Citation: Class: HO107; Piece: 2225; Folio: 253; Page: 40; GSU roll: 87234-87235.
no sign of Joseph and Edward for sure.
there is an Edward Tootell marrying in manchester in 1837 adn 1841 as well as a Joseph in 1841 as well as several marys and Ellen but without seeing the certs to see fathers name, no way to tell if they are the right ones.
Tootell is definetely a Lancashire name
George and Mary Ann Hughes married in March quarter 1848 in manchester, Volume 20 page 594
dont see them in the 1851 census