Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisited”
-
In reply to:
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
Richard McCool 11/24/02
I will be responding to your latest post after thanksgiving - probably near the end of next week. I have much to write.
It seems that your unique failure to adequately research a subject before publishing on the Internet your rushes to judgement has created another faux pas for yourself similar to your previous "DAR Headquarters did not approve Violetta's membership" faux pas.This time the subject is different.
More on thatin my response next week.
Hope you have a good thanksgiving holiday.We will be leaving for awhile.
Ed
More Replies:
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
Richard McCool 11/26/02
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
Ed Gusman 12/03/02
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
Richard McCool 12/03/02
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
Ed Gusman 12/04/02
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
-
Re: Van Siclen/Van Sicklen Controversy revisitedu201d
Richard McCool 11/26/02